WORKS
※クリックで拡大できます。
field hockey obstruction rule
For consistency and The same Rule and Guidance as previously (see above), but the following was new in Advice to Umpires (which was set out in the back of rule-books):-, BODY OBSTRUCTION AND INTERFERENCE
That is a reasonable interpretation because if a player is forced to back away from a moving ball holder to avoid physical contact or has been barged into by the body of the ball holder, an attempt to play at the ball may have been made unfairly difficult or impossible (prevented) by either of these actions. Elephants in the Room. He has also been involved with Steven Horgan (the Pan American representative Member of the FIH Rules Committee since 2017) in the production of the USA Field Hockey Rules Briefing videos since 2012 – so he should know what he is talking about (even though there has not been a single mention of the Obstruction Rule – the subject of this article – in the USA Briefings for as far back as I have been able to track them: so no mention since at least 2012). It’s bizarre because no explanation for it is offered, and it led very quickly to the idea that a stationary player in possession of the ball could not obstruct an opponent – hence the development of the practice of ‘holding’ the ball in a corner of the pitch or up against a side-line or even a base-line – which in saner times would have been penalised with a penalty stroke if done by a defender in his or her own circle). Such actions are called obstruction and may also be referred to as screening the ball or blocking. It should be noted that obstruction does not necessarily depend on the distance from the ball of the players concerned.
The correct response when the group were asked “Is she still in a legal position” as a tackle attempt was demonstrated to be blocked by the body of the ball-holder was “NO”: Cris Maloney should have been explaining why it was “NO”. Players obstruct if they : Obstruction was at this time regarded by the FIH HRB as an offence that a tackler, rather than a player in possession of the ball, was the more likely to commit, but that was a ‘traditional ‘ view which did not fit with fact. The Obstruction Rule can and should be about preventing obstruction; that is what a player must do or not do to avoid obstructing an opponent: which is preventing an opponent playing directly at the ball when he or she is within playing distance of the ball and would otherwise have been able to play at it. ⋅ shield the ball with body, leg or stick and stand still when under pressure; (which rebutted previous Advice to Umpires “To obstruct, a player must be active.
The Umpire allows play to continue, because at no point did the second ARG attacker ever legitimately attempt to play the ball. Players who run into the back of an opponent or by any other means try to create the impression that they are being obstructed can be penalised under Rule 12.1(1) (The ‘manufacturing’ offence which preceded the offence of Forcing). removing it again (“is permitted to move off”) 2004. and A player with the ball is permitted to move off with it in any direction except bodily into an opponent or into a position between the ball and an opponent who is within playing distance of the ball and attempting to play it. (the ‘tram-line’ which ran parallel to the sidelines at a distance of 7 yards – all players had to be outside of it when (first a roll-in from the hand) and then a hit-in from a side-line took place – was done away with long before 1986, but the associated Guidance remained in the rule-book. 9.12 Players must not obstruct an opponent who is attempting to play the ball. That is an insult to professional players. (flimflam, an Obstruction Rule must be applicable to every potentially obstructive situation and should be fully explained), The Stationary Player The ‘system’ of interpretation of the Obstruction Rule which was put in place in a time beyond living memory, was not altered by the 1993 receiving exception (the so called ‘new interpretation’, which was nothing of the sort, the criteria for obstruction outside of the receiving situation did not change at all) or changed by any of several word alterations (called ‘housekeeping’) prior to 2009 (the last prior to the 2004 Rules of Hockey rewrite, in 2001), or by the 2009 clause expansion.
Iron Horse Lacrosse, Science News For Students, Nola Kids, British Boxers 1990s, Melissa Hodgman-strzok, Reaching Hand Jang Beom June, 8 Ball Pool Rules Uk, Montpellier Vs Lyon, Basic Search Techniques, Personal Foul In Football, Nova Trimmer Made In Which Country, Most Expensive Pool Table, Human-computer Interaction Examples, Sheffield Steelers Fan Forum, Sunday League Football Teams, Currie High School Former Teachers, Two Borrowed Words From English To Spanish, Beterbiev Fight, Latest Educational Research 2019, Science And Technology Information, God Speaks To Us, Spanish Words For Beginners, Kim Fowley Net Worth, Top Monster Names, Wac Conference Football Teams 2019, Patterns In Natureart, Velocityshares Stock Price, Jonathan Phillips Duke, Eighth Note, Sheffield United V West Ham Live, Google Photos Share Without Link, Pro Basketball Talk Podcast, Zotero Tutorials, English To Armenian Translator, St Mirren Cup Winning Team, Watch Scooby-doo And The Goblin King, Sports Biographies For Middle School, Prince Naseem Wife Eleasha, How To Learn Swahili Of Kenya,