An affect-based model of recipients' responses to organizational change events, Leadership and employees’ reactions to change: The role of leaders’ personal attributes and transformational leadership style, The impact of top leaders’ personality: The processes through which organizations become reflections of their leaders, Ambivalence toward imposed change: The conflict between dispositional resistance to change and the orientation toward the change agent, Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A sixty-year review of quantitative studies, A critical review of race and ethnicity in the leadership literature: Surfacing context, power and the collective dimensions of leadership, Leadership self-efficacy and managers’ motivation for leading change, The nature and implications of contextual influences on transformational leadership: A conceptual examination, Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change, Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: a longitudinal study, Linking leader skills, follower attitudes, and contextual variables via an integrated model of charismatic leadership, Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers, Structural inertia and organizational change, Testing a longitudinal model of distributed leadership effects on school improvement, Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change, Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise, The impact of power distance orientation on recipients’ reactions to participatory versus programmatic change communication.

Towers Watson (2010), Paul, P.: Change management: communication, employee commitment, and leadership (2004), © Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012, Business, Economics, Financial Sciences, and Management, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27966-9_21, Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing. Wang, G., Holmes, R. M., Oh, I. S., & Zhu, W. Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? We also point to several directions for future investigation. Battilana, J., Gilmartin, M., Sengul, M., Pache, A.-C., & Alexander, J. Bartunek, J. M., Rousseau, D. M., Rudolph, J. W., & DePalma, J. Do transformational CEOs always make the difference? Google Scholar Berson, Y., Da'as, R. a., & Waldman, D. A.

Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. How do harmonious passion and obsessive passion moderate the influence of a CEO’s change-oriented leadership on company performance? This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. Click Language. : How new leaders’ cognitive communities and recent “top-job” success affect organizational change and performance, Transformational leadership in an acquisition: A field study of employees, Leading organizational change in the ‘new’South Africa. Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change. Knowledge Solution (2009), Nickols, F.: Change management 101, a premier. He now has existing profile on Google Scholar - Oleg Matveychev, but the results for English spelling name are the same as a month ago, no matter what I do. Unable to display preview. Enter your email address below and we will send you the reset instructions. Gerstner, W.-C., König, A., Enders, A., & Hambrick, D. C. CEO narcissism, audience engagement, and organizational adoption of technological discontinuities, Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation, Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia, Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms, Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective, Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm, Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives, Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. While signed in, visit My Citations in Google Scholar. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. Creating readiness for organizational change.

Bartunek, J. M., Krim, R., Necochea, R., & Humphries, M. Sensemaking, sensegiving, and leadership in strategic organizational development. At the end the way of implementing the change management is examined. Kogan page, Beakdal, T., Hansen, K.: Change management handbook (2006), Leal-Valias, M.: Management of change.