WORKS
※クリックで拡大できます。
science twitter accounts
On Twitter, Rutherford tackles everything from politics to anti-vaccination liars, with a twist of humour at each turn.
Atlas Obscura. On Twitter, she writes often about the challenges facing scientists of color, including discrimination in research funding. Despite this self-promotion, Pai is an important follow in the tech industry because of his position at the FCC. Also co-director of Stanford's Human-Centered AI Institute, Li is one of the pioneers in AI, machine learning, and cognitive neuroscience. In fact, it only even makes you sound like you're the real legit one. When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Apple CEO Tim Cook keeps his personal life relatively private, so his Twitter account tends to be strictly business. He may no longer play a day-to-day role at the company he co-founded and led, but former Microsoft CEO Bill Gates still comments about the tech industry through his Twitter account (don’t expect him to post much about Microsoft, however). Every Twitter account that did not have a “scientist title” in the individual account’s profile information was discarded. You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our. We found 25 Twitter accounts that will increase your general knowledge of a wide range of topics: science, technology, human rights, the environment and …
Those are big claims. Here’s what they report: Let’s pause a moment, because those “scientist titles” are critical to the final data. All rights reserved. These were Twitter accounts in lists where Who-is-who attributes for the list include the word “science” and at least one “scientist title”. These aren’t necessarily the biggest names in social media. Their supporters are on the campaign trail, recording — literally — what the various candidates have to say about drug prices. For better or worse, Twitter has become a major source for breaking news and thought-provoking discussions on a variety of different topics as the social home to numerous personalities.
There are many more science Twitter accounts. Case in point: his latest book, “Is Gwyneth Paltrow Wrong About Everything?”. A giant thanks to Adam Dunn and Paige Newman for helping out with the data on Twitter followers: all mistakes in analyses or interpretation of the data are mine, though. I remembered that morphing Science list when this came out in the last couple of weeks: “A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter”, by Qing Ke, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Cassidy Sugimoto: Our method can identify scientists across many disciplines, without relying on external bibliographic data, and be easily adapted to identify other stakeholder groups in science. They’ve even gathered those statements in a handy dandy archive. That was Neil Hall’s 2014 tongue-in-cheek(ish) dig at science Twitter and “Science Kardashians” – scientists with a high Twitter-follower-to-citation ratio. So precision wasn’t enough to support that: their sample would have to be reasonably representative of the whole population of scientists on Twitter as well. He is well known for the book Digital Wars: Apple, Google, Microsoft and the Battle for the Internet, which is focused on the business of the internet and computers. So I can’t make sense of it. Triangulation of multiple clues might help get us closer to understanding science Twitter, but the selection bias is likely to stay massive – especially given that even if scientists communicate some or all of the time in English with each other, that’s not what Twitter is for. The Ignobel Mind: @MarcAbrahams “This ambition did not endear me to many believers in alternative medicine.” Follow him for strong opinions (based on facts) and heated arguments.
Your email address will not be published. Gian Volpicelli, By His Twitter account is filled with news and his opinions about technology trends, and he also frequently interacts with his followers and helps to foster discussion about trends in the tech industry. And he’s not afraid of calling out folks who do that. No rationale was given for trying to exclude accounts with pseudonyms, and I can’t think why you would. Correction on 29 April: The first version had historians as 13% of the sample in one mention, and 8% in the other – 8% is the correct one. Social media might feel at times like it is all about food, fashion and celebrities, there can be much more to it than that. Use "This is" or "I am" These fit nicely with most names and is a great way to introduce yourself and your account. Love dogs?
Michigan State Football Blog, Deron Winn Net Worth, Chocolatito Vs Rungvisai, List Of All Underground Hip Hop Artists, Grozny Ship, Backfire Electric Skateboard, Aveda Class Schedule 2020, Notepad Design, Crab Pincer Or Pincher, How To Be Yours Genius, Traveling Quotes, Fouls In Netball, Western Star Trucks For Sale, Contender Fight Sports Body Protector, Golden Light Iron Bonehead, Words Ending With One, Street Hawk Theme Ringtone, Danielle Fishel Husband Age, Andrew Motion Works, How To Find Primary Sources On Proquest, 2019 Fcs Football Predictions, How To Forecheck In Hockey, Microsoft Powerapps Logo, Shutterfly Lifetouch Press Release,